Question about SG Resetter.

[Kain]

Can always do a spoiler tag maybe, Kain? =)

Things have a schedule to them, and it doesn't appear to be the only thing the GMs are working on, so whenever it comes really.

I'm personally glad we'll be getting an SG Resetter at all, it'll definately make my decision to make a Star Gladiator easier

I did spoiler, a sig can't hold up to that much characters.

[Aozora]

I said it was done a week ago but I had to work on a higher priority project with Talis. Not to mention testing it last week wouldn't matter anyway since we weren't going to do s reboot till the project was done. Not sure why all of you feel the need to post either. I don't care if YOU guys think I'm lazy. I just see you guys as making dumb attemps to troll, with nothing better to do than to try and nitpick retarded stuff that you probably don't even give a shit about in the first place.

Regardless, it is going to be released around when I planned it to be released.

Well again, it takes only a few minutes to test it. I highly doubt you didn't have few extra minutes during the week to test it. And the NPC could actually be implementd without a reboot with the @loadnpc command, unless you have an OnInit label on it for some strange reason. But anyways I'm getting off track.

To me it just seems silly to say that something as simple as a single NPC doing a single thing is not in due to it not being tested. It doesn't matter if it's not in because you didn't have time to reboot yet or something, but your initial reasons as to why the NPC wasn't in seemed dumb to me. That's just me saying what I think. I'm not trying to troll here, that's simply what I think. If I was trying to troll I'd be making fun of you and calling you some silly and dumb names, pointing out several other things and so on. I was simply giving my opinion. If doing that is considered trolling then I guess I'm just trolling in a sea of trolls =(

[Kibou]

I think the important thing to look at is:

The scheduled maintenance is on the 17th. Not today, not yesterday, not last week, and definitely not tomorrow.

We've waited this long, let's try some more. =)

[Kain]

You're so positive lol.
Do you see a glass as half full even though it's empty?

[hunksurvivorx]

anyway...i waited 3 fucking years for a damn SG reset NPC...waiting a little longer wont kill me at this rate ;3.

keep it going

[Kibou]

You're so positive lol.
Do you see a glass as half full even though it's empty?

I wouldn't be my namesake if I wasn't =x

Well, depends, I mean an empty glass is still full of air right?

Nah, I'm not -that- gullible/naive/whathaveyou, even if I can be like that at times.

But it was said it'd be there on the 17th, if it is it is, if it isn't it isn't. I think there's worse for me to consider of this server than a GM's timetable, you know, like their ethics and so forth.

(Basically what I'm getting at is, it's not like we're playing a game that massively fails in providing us with more or less solid entertainment, you should have seen the frothing that's happened in places like Phantasy Star Universe and Aion @_@)

[listatxx]

Don't even worry about the QQing Haine, you're doing great. <3

[Kirek]

Alright you QQ people what we're really testing for is the ID10T error my friends. You any idea how hard to find that factor is.
Ya you can test it and say "oh I went through all the proper channels to make sure that if everyone does the CORRECT thing, it'll go hunky dory."

Users are notorious for discovering the ID10T error, because they simply don't know what they're doing. These past holiday events should show you just how easily these errors show up, we do LOTS AND LOTS of testing and yet these little bugs just crawl up from somewhere. Things that don't even make sense because the error has NOTHING to do with what all the issues are pointing at.

[Aozora]

And here I thought we established already that a simple NPC like this doesn't cause natural disasters and server explosions. It just doesn't unless the scripter is doing something horribly horribly wrong. You ignored everything I had been saying, an NPC like this does not need LOTS AND LOTS of testing. Because it's not a complex or a long script, it does not do multiple things it cannot bork in ways that you think it can bork. If something horribly borks, then it's the scritpers fault for doing something utterly idiotic, and I'd like to believe that the GM's here know how to script so much that they won't throw random script commands in the NPC script that break things.

In how many ways can you use the NPC? You can probably say "yes" or "no" when it asks you if you want to reset. That's about it. There's no way players can use an NPC like that "wrong".

[Fidelis]

Yeah yeah, but can't we all just agree that my post is a great piece of art? Until now, Kain was the only one to appreciate it, and he deserves my thanks for that, but I want more people to recognize my great mind!

[lgun]

I was wondering who was the ID10T that messing with the code... 


o.o sorry

[Aozora]

Yeah yeah, but can't we all just agree that my post is a great piece of art? Until now, Kain was the only one to appreciate it, and he deserves my thanks for that, but I want more people to recognize my great mind!

It needs more ponies and rainbows =(

[Kibou]

I dunno, I appreciated both Fidelis & Kirek's posts =) I was just caught up at the time with talking with Kain on the spoiler sig thing

And let's try this again since it's a new day, especially Aozora (No hard feelings ):

The maintenance isn't until tomorrow. It wasn't supposed to happen last week, month, year, or millenium. Won't even happen today. It'll be tomorrow. =x

The argument about how long the testing -should- take is rather irrelevant if it so happens that someone's own free time dictates they'll be able to get to it whenever -they- feel most appropriate before a deadline.

TL;DR: No real point in rushing what's set in stone, aye?

Let's just wait and see what tomorrow brings, shall we?

[Kain]

Actually the original post was to ask if the resetter will reset hatred too, but alright.

[Kibou]

Yeah, I don't really know what brought about how it turned into people questioning how complex such coding would make for 'long'/'late' testing, but it was probably turned into that without realizing about the maintenance, so I'm just trying to keep that in our perspective.