You do have over 6000 posts Digi, but I don't really know of alot of "serious" conversation you've contributed to "seriously."
And this is where you prove that posts count for nothing.
I have my own guide, some implemented suggestions and some threads in general discussion that were pretty 'serious' (such as talk about the exp show that we had, but then for some reason went..stupid).
Whereas you..mostly spam, I do believe.
Game, set, match.
(deletes a line of posting). I gave a valid argument for my positon in a thread where I shouldn't of had to. Thank you for helping to support comments that have nothing to do with the original topic. Another +1 for Suki. I wonder if I check 3000 of her posts how many will be +1. I'm sorry, 6000.
@castrik. Ok, you got me. I don't want to judge a book by its cover, but the GM's haven't enabled profile viewing (isn't that like a push of a button or a flip of a switch?), so all I have to go off of is the number of posts a person has, especially when i don't see them contribute to alot of conversations.
You don't need to prove anything, dear.
As I said, post count means jack, as he's clearly proven.
But I still have many posts. ;Da
If you want me to believe your post counts mean nothing and that the vast majority is +1'ing and spam, ok.
