Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 178
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 183
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 184
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 220
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 223
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 235
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 250
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /var/www/html/jellyro.com/archive/forums/Sources/Load.php on line 268 Print Page - SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Old aRO Forums
The 'Other' Section => AnesisRO Archive => Archive => General Questions => Topic started by: Ark on September 19, 2009, 01:37:03 am
Title: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Ark on September 19, 2009, 01:37:03 am
So i have this doubt, lets say i have 90+ magic def and suddenly this wizard/HW uses SG on me, it would be very hard to freeze me due to my high magic def right? so what if this wizard/HW uses a HW card and uses SG on me again; will the effect, that is on the description of the card, increase the SG chances to freeze me (since it will ignore 50% of my magic def) or the 50% applies only to the damage i will recieve as if i had 45+ magic def?
i know it may sound like a dumb question or a little confusing, but i just want to clear that doubt, so can anyone tell me? :(
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Aryia on September 19, 2009, 01:41:20 am
If you have 95 mdef, you won't freeze, even if they're wearing HW cards.
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: valiant1709 on September 19, 2009, 01:48:35 am
the freeze effect will not changed (high enough mdef wont freeze you). The only thing that changed with Hw card is the damage u will receive
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Ark on September 19, 2009, 01:52:48 am
ah thx a lot guys :)
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: -Nick- on September 19, 2009, 02:56:51 am
if you have 95 in mdef you will die of 1 sg (=
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Ark on September 19, 2009, 03:07:54 am
:'(
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: levin on September 19, 2009, 03:14:10 am
actually in SG i think u need quite high mdef to not freeze right?
remembered someone tested SG. and someone else also said that SG has a 100% freeze chance as long as ur hit the 3rd time.
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Rembrandt on September 19, 2009, 12:06:14 pm
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Ark on September 19, 2009, 04:16:11 pm
i guess i will have to pot more on woe :'(
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: exDragon on September 19, 2009, 06:06:14 pm
Storm gust is different from other freeze effects in that its not based on chance on whether you freeze or not. It's based on damaging hits(after 3 hits you freeze). However, you only count damaging hits as if the person is not wearing the high wizard card since high wizard card only effects damage.
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: balam on September 19, 2009, 06:11:06 pm
Fact: You dont freeze after 3 SG hits with 95+mdef wether or not the SG caster uses a HW card
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: exDragon on September 19, 2009, 06:19:39 pm
From what I've heard, to not freeze from a storm of gust you need this value to be zero or negative (97 - MDEF - LUK/3).
So with 95 magic defense you need at least 6 luck.
Title: Re: SG + HW card vs Magic Def.
Post by: Renian on September 19, 2009, 06:56:32 pm
I knew this'll come up again XD
Here, I made an inquiry into this issue a while ago, and came up with the solution: